Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

Understanding how outcomes are measured in workplace physical activity interventions: a scoping review

Abstract : Background: An inverse relationship exists between physical activity and many non-communicable diseases, such as obesity. Given the daily time spent, a logical domain to reach an adult population for intervention is within and around the workplace. Many government bodies, including the World Health Organization (WHO), include worksite health promotions (WHPs) targeted at increasing physical activity as a public health intervention. The aim of this scoping review was to determine what was measured (outcomes) and how they were measured (evaluation tools) during workplace physical activity interventions in order to identify gaps and implications for policies and practice. in order to coincide with the WHO's Global Plan of Action on Worker's Health. Extracted information was arranged into data collection grids. Cross-analysis of measured outcomes with their corresponding evaluation tools was completed. A quality assessment based on study design was executed. Results: Identification of 732 records was made and ultimately 20 studies and reviews that met criteria were selected. Researchers themed 9 primary measured outcomes. Studies utilized various forms of both objective and subjective evaluation methods. Three primary evaluation methods were categorized: biologic, electronic and declarative tools. The researchers discovered 92 unique tools: 27 objective and 65 subjective, within these parameters. Conclusion: Study quality, measurement tools and data collection were heterogeneous making analysis of effect comparisons problematic and unreliable. Much of the published research does not employ robust statistical analysis making effects difficult to ascertain. Considering the variety of both measured outcomes and evaluation tools, only educated inferences can be made as to the effectiveness and efficiency of WHPs. More standardized measurement practices are therefore suggested for assessment efficiency.
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [48 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger
Contributeur : documentation INSEP Connectez-vous pour contacter le contributeur
Soumis le : jeudi 8 novembre 2018 - 16:29:05
Dernière modification le : mardi 25 janvier 2022 - 18:56:07
Archivage à long terme le : : samedi 9 février 2019 - 14:47:50


Understanding how outcomes are...
Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte



Stacey Johnson, Jean-Philippe Regnaux, Adrien Marck, Geoffroy C.B. Berthelot, Joana Ungureanu, et al.. Understanding how outcomes are measured in workplace physical activity interventions: a scoping review. BMC Public Health, BioMed Central, 2018, 18, ⟨10.1186/s12889-018-5980-x⟩. ⟨hal-01916669⟩



Consultations de la notice


Téléchargements de fichiers