Recovery From Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage: Cold-Water Immersion Versus Whole-Body Cryotherapy

Abd-Elbasset Abaidia; Julien Lamblin; Barthelemy Delecroix; Cédric Leduc; Alan Mccall; Mathieu Nedelec; Brian Dawson; Georges Baquet; Gregory Dupont

doi:10.1123/ijspp.2016-0186

Article dans une revue

Recovery From Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage: Cold-Water Immersion Versus Whole-Body Cryotherapy

Abd-Elbasset Abaidia ^{1, 2} Julien Lamblin Barthelemy Delecroix ² Cédric Leduc ³ Alan Mccall ⁴ Mathieu Nedelec ⁵ Brian Dawson ⁶ Georges Baquet ² Gregory Dupont ^{2, 4}

1 Université Lille Nord de France (COMUE)

2 URePSSS - Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Sport, Santé, Société (URePSSS) - EA 7369

3 UPJV - Université de Picardie Jules Verne

4 Edinburgh Napier University

5 SEP (EA7370) - French Institute of Sport (INSEP), Research Department, Laboratory Sport, Expertise and Performance (EA7370)

6 UWA - The University of Western Australia

Abstract : Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of cold-water immersion and whole-body cryotherapy on recovery kinetics following exercise induced muscle damage. Methods: Ten physically active men performed single-leg hamstring eccentric exercise comprising 5 sets of 15 repetitions. Immediately post-exercise, subjects were exposed in a randomized cross-over design to cold-water immersion (10 minutes at 10°C) or whole-body cryotherapy (3 minutes at -110°C) recovery. Creatine kinase concentrations, knee flexor eccentric (60°.s-1) and posterior lower limb isometric (60°) strength, single-leg and two leg countermovement jump, muscle soreness and perception of recovery were measured. The tests were performed before, immediately, 24h, 48h and 72h after exercise. Results: Results showed a very likely moderate effect in favour of cold-water immersion for single-leg [Effect Size (ES) = 0.63; 90% Confidence Interval (CI) = -0.13 to 1.38] and two-leg countermovement jump (ES = 0.68; 90% CI = -0.08 to 1.43) 72h after exercise. Soreness was moderately lower 48h after exercise following cold-water immersion (ES = -0.68; 90% CI = 1.44 to 0.07). Perception of recovery was moderately enhanced 24h after exercise for cold water immersion (ES = -0.62; 90% CI = -1.38 to 0.13). Trivial and small effects of condition were found for the other outcomes. Conclusion: Cold-water immersion was more effective in accelerating recovery kinetics than whole-body cryotherapy for countermovement jump performance at 72h post-exercise. Cold-water immersion also demonstrated lower soreness and higher perceived recovery levels across 24-48h post-exercise.

Keywords : eccentric cold-air muscle damage fatigue

Type de document :

Article dans une revue

Domaine :

Sciences de l'Homme et Société / Sport

Sciences de l'Homme et Société / Sport / Physiologie du sport

Sciences du Vivant [q-bio] / Médecine humaine et pathologie / Physiologie [q-bio.TO]

Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [29 références] Voir Masquer Télécharger

https://hal-insep.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02524887
Contributeur : Valérie Quaireau <>
Soumis le : lundi 30 mars 2020 - 16:01:29
Dernière modification le : samedi 4 avril 2020 - 01:51:14

Abaidia - Recovery From Exerci...

Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Recovery From Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage: Cold-Water Immersion Versus Whole-Body Cryotherapy

Fichier

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Exporter

Métriques

65

505

Recovery From Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage: Cold-Water Immersion Versus Whole-Body Cryotherapy

Fichier

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Exporter

Partager

Métriques

65

505